Tue 30 Nov 2010
I thought since I blogged this spring about the finale of these shows, I should update whether I’m still watching or not. 🙂
I was unhappy in my previous post about the finale the The Good Wife. I thought the show had chance to move past the whole will she/won’t she get back together with her husband or go with her supposed true love, Will. This plotline had been spinning its wheels for the whole first season.
Half a season into the show this year and viewers still don’t have a a resolution on it.
And, yet, I’m watching anyway. Why? I’ll explain.
To recap, It took until last week for Alicia to discover that Will’s long, rambling declaration of love had been deleted from her cell phone by Eli, the conniving campaign manager that her husband, aka Mr. Big, hired. (Chris Noth is Peter Florrick in this show. But he’s very much like Mr. Big before he settled down. He’s charming but you’re never quite sure how much sleaze goes with that.)
But all that has basically taken second place to two other plotlines this season. One is at Alicia’s law firm, which has merged with a Washington D.C. law firm to stay afloat in these bad economic times. The second is the election for district attorney. Thankfully, we’ve moved past Peter’s appeal and now he’s scott free instead of being behind bars or cooped up in the Florrick apartment. Not only that, he wants his old job back.
Around all this revolves subplots with the teenage Florrick children, who are refreshingly flawed and realistic and who are put in a lousy position by their father. They keep a lot to themselves, which continues to cause problems for both parents, especially about the election.
I find I’m enjoying the law firm plotline more because the claws are definitely out. Plus, more of Christine Baranski as Alicia’s mentor is always a good thing. As for Will…
I can’t quite decide myself who Alicia should be with–and I’m not entirely clear that she does either. Part of the charm of Alicia is that she’s very self-contained, so when she shows any emotion, it has impact. But on this one, it’s like she’s Ilsa in Casablanca, in love with both men and caught in complete indecision.
Peter made his play earlier this season, with possibly the hottest scene on TV that shows nothing but indicates cunnilingus. Will, Alicia’s boss, has been busy being an ass, trying to possibly screw over his partners, and involve sexually with an annoying woman who seems to value little. Not such much for Team Will on this end.
The only element that’s not working for me this season is Kalinda’s rival.
Kalinda is the go-to investigator who can seemingly uncover anything, half by charm, half by intelligence. Archie Punjabi rightly won an Emmy for her performance last year. But this year, she’s stuck with a rival brought in by the D.C. partner. This could be interesting except the rival is so smarmy and annoying and likely evil that I’m completely uninterested. I think Kalinda needed some competition or to fail now and then. But this subplot seems disjointed and needlessly complicated.
So at half-season, the firm might break up, Alicia’s still ambivalent about her husband and his political career, the teenagers are out of control, and Alicia is caught in the middle of it all. I look forward to her eventual breakdown or outburst.
A great bonus so far has also been Anika Noni Rose (Dreamgirls) as the white horse candidate for district attorney who’s smarter and more politically savvy that she first seemed.
Verdict: the show has improved over last season, now they just need to move one way or another with the Florrick marriage. If you’re interested, CBS has the full episodes at the official site linked above.
As for Law & Order…
I had some hopes for Law & Order: Los Angeles. A fresh area, a fresh cast, the possibilities for star-studded crime seemed endless. But I have to say I’m a bit bored so far this season. The writers made good use of the L.A. setting a few times, particularly in the premiere where they used photos taken by paparazzi to nail the bad guys, but the writing seems a bit flat.
It just seems a bit dull.
Right now, the L&O that I’m enjoying the most is on BBC America. Law & Order UK.
I shouldn’t like it so much. The shows are using old original recipe L&O scripts as the basis for these shows so about twenty minutes in, I suddenly recognize the plot. But they’ve switched them up somewhat to reflect the London setting. Briscoe was all about phone records. The detectives in this one are all about the video footage that dots London.
But somehow it has the heart that the LA show lacks.
I think the difference is the actors.
The ones in L.A. are good but not great. I know. I’d expected Skeets Ulrich to be more interesting but he seems uncomfortable in his role.
And Alfred Molina is no match for Ben Daniels, his UK equivalent. Daniels played Nicholas Brocklehurst in The State Within–a British miniseries set in American that’s very, very good. I am crushing on Mr. Daniels a bit but he doesn’t play for my team, alas.
Backing up Daniels is Freema Agyeman, best known to Dr. Who fans as Martha Jones. Jamie Bamber, another SF veteran (Battlestar Galactica) plays the younger of the two cops–the Chris Noth role- and Bradley Walsh is the veteran and more cynical police detective.
There are only two problems with the UK version.
The big one is that there’s no Jerry Orbach.
Bradley Walsh is close but not quite, though if I’d never watched Orbach’s Briscoe, I’d probably enjoy his character more. And I think Bill Patterson is a poor substitute for Steven Hill’s head district attorney.
Also, he does not eat enough sandwiches. 🙂